Agentic deployment infrastructure for Physical AI

From trained model to the hardware you ship.

AnyDevice turns the manual work of optimizing, validating and packaging AI models for physical devices into a repeatable deployment loop.

Inputsmodel checkpointshardware requirementAnyDevicerecursively improvingauto-optimization harnessDeliverablescross-devicemodel runtime
01

Inputs

model checkpoints · hardware requirement

02

AnyDevice

recursively improving auto-optimization harness

03

Deliverables

cross-device model runtime

01

Private by design

Keep control of your models, data and deployment artifacts.

02

Hardware-aware

Optimize and validate for the silicon and constraints you actually ship.

03

Self-improving harness

The agent loop itself is rewritten between runs — roles, contracts and orchestration get sharper on your stack with every iteration.

The problem

Every new model, hardware or firmware update recreates the deployment problem.

Conversion, runtime integration, optimization and regression checks are typically fragmented across tools and specialists. That slows the move from an impressive model to an operational physical system.

The platform

A closed loop for the path from model to machine.

AnyDevice Agents work across the deployment stack, and the harness itself sharpens between runs — instead of treating optimization as a one-time export.

  1. 01

    Define the target

    Bring the model, hardware and the operational constraints that matter.

  2. 02

    Search the deployment space

    Explore compatible model, runtime and hardware-aware optimization paths.

  3. 03

    Validate on target

    Check the chosen path against the target device before it reaches the field.

  4. 04

    Ship an artifact

    Hand off a deployment-ready package and the context behind it.

Hardware-aware by default

Start from the real compute, memory, latency and runtime constraints.

Full-stack deployment path

Coordinate model, operator, runtime and artifact decisions in one workflow.

Evidence over promises

Keep validation tied to the workload and device being evaluated.

Where we start

Built for teams putting AI into the physical world.

01

Warehouse robotics

Put perception, navigation and action models onto the robot hardware that runs the operation.

  • VLM / VLA
  • Perception
  • Manipulation
02

Industrial vision

Move inspection intelligence to the factory floor with a validated runtime for the target device.

  • Vision
  • Inspection
  • Edge runtime
03

Physical AI systems

Extend the same deployment loop across cameras, machines and other on-device AI products.

  • Cross-hardware
  • On-device
  • Production

Validation is part of deployment

Know what you are shipping.

The useful question is not whether a model runs somewhere. It is whether the selected path meets the operational requirements of the device in front of you.

Latency and responsiveness
Memory and compute envelope
Output quality against task requirements
Power and runtime compatibility

The AnyDevice difference

An MCP server that turns any LLM into a deployment expert.

LLM-agnostic and self-improving, it performs in-depth analysis, makes cross-hardware optimization, evaluation and deployment repeatable, and tackles unseen deployment challenges — with no data or model secrets ever leaving your device. Each deployment produces pairwise feedback that rewrites the agent's roles, contracts and orchestration, so the harness specializes to your hardware instead of staying generic.

Benchmark

Benchmark case studies across physical AI workloads.

Two workloads, one deployment harness: robotics models evaluated across Ada6000 and Jetson AGX Thor, plus CV workloads on RTX 6000 Ada.

Case study 01

Small VLA & Pi0.5 models

Pi0.5

  • Ada6000PyTorch Eager (baseline)200 ms1.0× faster
  • Ada6000Ours (stable pipeline)*78 ms2.6× faster
  • Ada6000Ours (ultra-fast pipeline)*47 ms4.3× faster
  • ThorPyTorch Eager (baseline)320 ms1.0× faster
  • ThorOurs (stable pipeline)*71 ms4.5× faster
  • ThorOurs (ultra-fast pipeline)*44 ms7.3× faster

SmolVLA

  • Ada6000PyTorch Eager (baseline)249 ms1.0× faster
  • Ada6000Ours (stable pipeline)*42 ms5.9× faster
  • Ada6000Ours (ultra-fast pipeline)*30 ms8.3× faster
  • ThorPyTorch Eager (baseline)355 ms1.0× faster
  • ThorOurs (stable pipeline)*68 ms5.2× faster
  • ThorOurs (ultra-fast pipeline)*54 ms6.6× faster

* Stable pipeline runs with the original model; no model changes required.* Ultra-fast pipeline requires LoRA fine-tuning for the target model.

Baseline vs oursPi0.5Stable pipeline
Baseline vs oursSmolVLAStable pipeline

Comparison with SoTA

AnyDevice vs SoTA Competitors

Pi0.5 · Ada6000 · PyTorch Eager baseline 200 ms

PhyAI2.56×
Ours (stable)2.56×
Ours (ultra-fast)4.26×

Pi0.5 · Thor · PyTorch Eager baseline 320 ms

PhyAI0.89×
Ours (stable)4.51×
Ours (ultra-fast)7.27×

SmolVLA is omitted — neither repo supports it. Bars show speedup over PyTorch Eager on the same hardware.

Case study 02 · CV workloads

Agentic Pipeline on CV workloads

anydevice agent demo (stable pipeline)

microsoft/resnet-18

Classification
  • PyTorch Eager (baseline)1.185 ms1.0×
  • Ours (stable)0.174 ms6.8× faster
Input
1×3×224×224
Output agreement vs PyTorch
max abs diff 0.035

facebook/dinov2-small-imagenet1k-1-layer

Feature Extraction
  • PyTorch Eager (baseline)2.871 ms1.0×
  • Ours (stable)0.437 ms6.6× faster
Input
1×3×224×224
Output agreement vs PyTorch
max abs diff 0.0467

facebook/sam-vit-base (vision encoder)

Vision encoder
  • PyTorch Eager (baseline)89.900 ms1.0×
  • Ours (stable)26.6 ms3.4× faster
Input
1×3×1024×1024
Output agreement vs PyTorch
max abs diff 0.0076

ultralytics/yolo26n

Object detection
  • PyTorch Eager (baseline)5.066 ms1.0×
  • Ours (stable)0.898 ms5.6× faster
Input
1×3×640×640
Output agreement vs PyTorch
max abs diff 0.047

* Tested on RTX 6000 Ada with 50 warmup + 1000 iters average.